AthleteData
Im a triathlete and the data for my training lives in 6 apps: Garmin, Strava, WHOOP, Intervals.icu, Wahoo, Withings, Apple Health, sometimes Hevy. Every morning Id eyeball a few of them and make a call on whether to do the planned session. For the past month I have been building a thing that does this for me, and got it to the point where I use it myself every day. It OAuths into whatever platforms you connect, reconciles the activities (tbh harder than it sounds — same ride shows up in Strava, Garmin, and Wahoo with different timestamps and rounding), computes daily load and readiness, and proactively messages you over Telegram or Whatsapp when something matters. Stack is straightforward: Typescript all the way, Postgres, an agent loop running on Claude (via Bedrock) with tool access to all your data + my computed metrics: zones, CTL/ATL/TSB, power/pace curves, anomaly detection on HRV and RHR, etc Two things that were harder than expected: 1. Garmins API only exposes the last 90 days. So for anyone with Garmin as their primary device, you have to backfill from Strava and stitch the two together. Strava has full history but misses some fields (e.g. HR-based TSS only — no power). Wahoo and intervals.icu fill different gaps. The dedup pipeline is ugly and I'd welcome feedback from anyone who has solved this better. 2. Deciding when to message vs. stay silent is entirely a product problem. Too chatty -> muted. Too quiet -> feels dead. One honest caveat though: no RCT data, and Id be skeptical of anyone who claims they have it for AI coaching at this stage. I am at ~50 paying users, I personally reach out to every user to build the next iterations of the product based on feedback. Already got testimonials from Ironman world championship finishers and other pro athletes. Theres also a $9/mo MCP tier for people who would rather pipe their data into their own Claude/ChatGPT. Happy to go deep on any topic! e.g. the tool-calling architecture, or the cost-per-user question (running an agent on every athlete daily is not free, and the margins here are worth discussing).
AI-анализ
Анализ скоро появится.
Похожие продукты
Social network where inviting someone makes you accountable for them
Chirpper is invite-only. When you vouch someone in, they join your TrustChain. Their behavior affects your TrustRank, and that propagates up the lineage. No moderators. The accountability is architectural, not policy-based. You can be pseudonymous, but you can't be unaccountable. Happy to get into the mechanics in comments.
Command Center, the AI coding env for people who care about quality
Hi HN! We’re Jimmy and Ray. Jimmy is a Thiel Fellow with a Ph. D. from MIT who has worked on programming tools for 15 years; Ray became VP of Sales at a $2B company when he was 19 and has built side-businesses vibe-coding. Last year, we set to answer the question “If AI can write code 100x faster, then why aren’t you shipping 100x faster?” What we learned shocked us — even fairly nontechnical people and solo founders told us they were spending more than half of their development time reading the AI-written code. And much of the rest of the time was spent either de-slop-ping it, or wishing they had done so. As luck turns out, our last two products were a tool that quickly onboards people to large codebases ( https://x.com/0xjimmyk/status/1873357324229984677 ) and trainings that taught deep concepts of code quality to CEOs, YC founders, and engineers at top companies ( mirdin.com ), so we were extremely well-positioned to solve these problems. Command Center is an agentic coding environment focused on quality. With a few keypresses, you can start building 3 features at once and soon have 3 diffs ready, each consisting of 2000 changed lines across 50 files…. This is normally the point where you think “Crap, what now?” With Command Center, at this point you simply click “Refactor,” and watch the vibed slop turn into readable robustness. Then you click “Generate Walkthrough,” and then suddenly, to read a 2000 line diff, instead of scrolling up and down trying to make sense of it, you just press the right arrow key 200 times. See something you don’t like? Click on line 37, type “Do this and all other network fetches in the background Cmd+Enter,” and you have a few more agents getting your code into final shape. Click or type “Commit,” “Push,” “Create PR” — you just shipped a high quality, non-slop feature We’re striving to be the best at every step of the pipeline, but can just try Command Center in pieces wherever you feel your current workflow is weakest. We have users who do all their coding in Zed or the Codex app, and then jump over to Command Center for a walkthrough when it finishes running. There’s even a skill that will pop open a Command Center walkthrough from the environment of your choice. Or you can just keep Command Center running while you do your work elsewhere, and if your AI deletes anything, you have Command Center’s snapshots to the rescue. We launched quietly last year and have been refining since. The quality and usability have kept going up, and Command Center is now ready for a lot more attention. Since our quiet launch, we’ve seen at least a dozen other agentic coding environments appear….approximately all of which have the same feature set focused on the part which is already easy (generating the first version of the code) and with at best a shoddy answer to the hard part (everything that comes after). Command Center’s focus is making the hard parts easy. Here’s what our users have to say: “[The refactorings] give your LLM taste. I’ve never seen an LLM write code this good before.” — Doug Slater, Staff Engineer, Climavision “With Command Center walkthroughs, I can get through a 400-line diff in less than half the time.” — Prateek Kumar, Platfor Engineer, Sumo Logic This product is not for everyone. If you’re someone who preaches “the prompt is the source, the code is the compiler output,” then you probably won’t enjoy Command Center. But if you want to uphold traditional engineering discipline while also shipping 20 PRs a day, then this is the environment for you.
A Highly Available Distributed Router for Global Realtime AI
Show HN: A Highly Available Distributed Router for Global Realtime AI
Rayline routes Claude Code subagents to on-device and cheaper models
Hi HN, I’m one of the builders of Rayline. Rayline is a Claude Code compatible LLM gateway. It intercepts and overrides claude code’s internal routing and lets you route subagent calls to different models instead. For example, you can run the main agent on Opus, some subagents on cloud-hosted open models, and other subagents on-device. We’ve seen others implement routing for claude code as tools the agent can invoke. In our experience, that doesn’t work well because it requires the main agent to use tokens to think about + call the tools, and LLMs are generally a very inefficient way to make routing decisions. By implementing Rayline as a gateway, we let users deterministically configure routing decisions, and you can optionally use our ML model to make routing decisions. We built it after noticing that Claude Code sessions contain a lot of subagent calls that don’t all need the same model. Other routers exist, but we built Rayline to let us continue using claude code (no separate harness), route tasks at a subagent level, and route across cloud and on-device. The main agent often benefits from Opus. But many delegated calls have narrow scope: search the repo, summarize context, inspect an error, poll for CI updates, etc. The thing we’re exploring is subagent-level routing. The main cost lever in coding agents is usually cached vs non-cached input. Subagent delegations are a natural point to make routing decisions because you avoid busting cache. We look at the message-thread context for a delegated call and choose a model for that call. At a task level, Sonnet and Haiku are almost always less capability-per-dollar than open models, so the main advantage is better + (much) cheaper subagents (60-90% in our private beta). The whole world seems to have started talking about model routing in the past two weeks, so apparently others agree it’s a relevant product area. We’d love to get feedback from the HN community!
DomainTasker
Show HN: DomainTasker – avoid losing domains and surprise renewals