Каталог продуктов

Angel Match

База данных из 110 000+ бизнес-ангелов и венчурных инвесторов. Экономьте время на поиске инвесторов — находите подходящих по отрасли, стадии и локации.

$38.8K /мес

Analytics

DataFast

Аналитика с фокусом на доход. Узнайте, какие маркетинговые каналы приводят клиентов. От первого клика до покупки — понимайте, откуда приходят деньги.

$21.9K /мес

Calendesk

Софт для онлайн-записи. Не тратьте время на согласование встреч — автоматизируйте запись, оплату и управление клиентами. Для терапевтов, коучей, юристов и сферы услуг.

$21.5K /мес

Capgo

Мгновенные обновления для Capacitor-приложений. Выпускайте исправления за минуты, а не недели. Отправляйте OTA-обновления пользователям без задержек App Store.

$15.2K /мес

Changelogfy

Принимайте лучшие решения и создавайте продукты на основе обратной связи. Единая платформа для сбора фидбека, приоритизации roadmap и публикации обновлений.

$4.3K /мес

Bitboard

We’re Connor and Ambar from BitBoard (https://bitboard.work). BitBoard is an agentic analytics workspace. We give you the infrastructure and visualization layer to analyze data with AI. Today, we’re launching dashboards that you and your agents can work on together. You can connect your coding agent or AI chat to BitBoard and build live reporting. Here’s a demo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPl0K565a7c. AI tools treat data analysis as ephemeral, making it hard to report or collaborate. Legacy BI tools weren’t intended for AI users, so they bolt on chatbots and can’t offer meaningful control to your agents. Software can now make far more of a business legible than BI ever could, but neither legacy BI nor chat bots are built to handle it. Our original product was AI agents for administrative tasks in healthcare (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44237769), but customers kept pulling us toward their data analysis problems: queries scattered across disparate sources, spreadsheets floating everywhere. We kept building tooling for addressing that, and at a certain point those tools were becoming our product. We ran into several problems. Agents made bad inferences because they had no context on the business. They couldn't be trusted to make decisions because nothing checked their work. And anything one agent or one person figured out was invisible to everyone else. In BitBoard, humans and agents interact with the same data primitives but get tools designed for their own work. We’re building dashboards to make the human reading experience better. These dashboards progressively use intelligence - starting from code or SQL queries and leading to full embedded apps. Humans and agents will need to agree on methods to interpret data, so we’re letting both contribute to canonical sources, entities, and measures (using your favorite semantic model or ours). Every answer comes with provenance, and the same call with the same parameters returns the same number. Looking ahead, these shared primitives let long-running agents operate inside a business, and we're building those agents too. An agent needs a measurable goal and a way to verify its work. BitBoard gives it both. The agent takes a problem like a metric drifting or a funnel leaking and figures out what to do next. Its work becomes datasets, dashboards, and traces that the team can observe and sign off on. Technically, we’re building a collaboration engine with isomorphic updates for humans and AI, columnar analysis (we use DuckDB and Apache Arrow), grounding and verification infrastructure, and enabling long running tasks with agent containers and traces. For agentic work we’re big fans of applying LLM judgement to discover problems, and then generating deterministic software to automate them. Try it out at https://app.bitboard.work. (We require an email so we can set up your account). We’re excited about how data analysis and science can change in the age of LLMs, and welcome all your thoughts!

AI Tools

Command Center, the AI coding env for people who care about quality

Hi HN! We’re Jimmy and Ray. Jimmy is a Thiel Fellow with a Ph. D. from MIT who has worked on programming tools for 15 years; Ray became VP of Sales at a $2B company when he was 19 and has built side-businesses vibe-coding. Last year, we set to answer the question “If AI can write code 100x faster, then why aren’t you shipping 100x faster?” What we learned shocked us — even fairly nontechnical people and solo founders told us they were spending more than half of their development time reading the AI-written code. And much of the rest of the time was spent either de-slop-ping it, or wishing they had done so. As luck turns out, our last two products were a tool that quickly onboards people to large codebases ( https://x.com/0xjimmyk/status/1873357324229984677 ) and trainings that taught deep concepts of code quality to CEOs, YC founders, and engineers at top companies ( mirdin.com ), so we were extremely well-positioned to solve these problems. Command Center is an agentic coding environment focused on quality. With a few keypresses, you can start building 3 features at once and soon have 3 diffs ready, each consisting of 2000 changed lines across 50 files…. This is normally the point where you think “Crap, what now?” With Command Center, at this point you simply click “Refactor,” and watch the vibed slop turn into readable robustness. Then you click “Generate Walkthrough,” and then suddenly, to read a 2000 line diff, instead of scrolling up and down trying to make sense of it, you just press the right arrow key 200 times. See something you don’t like? Click on line 37, type “Do this and all other network fetches in the background Cmd+Enter,” and you have a few more agents getting your code into final shape. Click or type “Commit,” “Push,” “Create PR” — you just shipped a high quality, non-slop feature We’re striving to be the best at every step of the pipeline, but can just try Command Center in pieces wherever you feel your current workflow is weakest. We have users who do all their coding in Zed or the Codex app, and then jump over to Command Center for a walkthrough when it finishes running. There’s even a skill that will pop open a Command Center walkthrough from the environment of your choice. Or you can just keep Command Center running while you do your work elsewhere, and if your AI deletes anything, you have Command Center’s snapshots to the rescue. We launched quietly last year and have been refining since. The quality and usability have kept going up, and Command Center is now ready for a lot more attention. Since our quiet launch, we’ve seen at least a dozen other agentic coding environments appear….approximately all of which have the same feature set focused on the part which is already easy (generating the first version of the code) and with at best a shoddy answer to the hard part (everything that comes after). Command Center’s focus is making the hard parts easy. Here’s what our users have to say: “[The refactorings] give your LLM taste. I’ve never seen an LLM write code this good before.” — Doug Slater, Staff Engineer, Climavision “With Command Center walkthroughs, I can get through a 400-line diff in less than half the time.” — Prateek Kumar, Platfor Engineer, Sumo Logic This product is not for everyone. If you’re someone who preaches “the prompt is the source, the code is the compiler output,” then you probably won’t enjoy Command Center. But if you want to uphold traditional engineering discipline while also shipping 20 PRs a day, then this is the environment for you.

Intunedhq

Hey HN, we're Faisal and Ahmad from Intuned (https://intunedhq.com). We’re building a platform for building, deploying, and maintaining browser automations. Customers primarily use the Intuned AI agent to automate websites that don't expose APIs. Common use-cases include scraping data, pulling reports, and submitting forms. As the website changes, our agent also helps automatically heal the automation. On Intuned, browser automations are created by an AI agent and run as code. Our infra captures the context of every run, allowing our agent to debug and maintain the underlying code - to keep the automations working over time. This way, we’re able to offer the predictability, speed, and cost of code, without the painful parts of writing and maintaining it. Here’s a demo of building a scraper on Intuned: https://youtu.be/ruZP73bK4FU Here’s a demo of using AI to maintain a project: https://youtu.be/e4R4hLdHBro Backstory: we were accepted into YC for a completely different idea. During the batch, because of Faisal's background at UiPath, several batchmates asked us whether RPA tools could fill API gaps in their products by automating websites without APIs. When it was time to pivot, we went back to those founders to dig deeper. (RPA in this context is referring to using UI automation to do complete non-testing tasks) We discovered that the actual hard problem in browser automation is maintenance. Websites change, selectors break, and failures can be painful to reproduce and fix. So in early 2024, we decided to take a crack at this problem with a handful of customers. It needed a fair number of iterations before we landed on our current code-first approach. How it works: Intuned is infra + agent, deeply integrated. On the infrastructure side, Intuned is a managed runtime for browser automation code. Projects are usually Playwright-based TypeScript or Python. Users can write them directly in our online IDE, or hand the work off to the agent. Either way, once deployed, the platform runs each project in its own isolated machine and handles auth/session reuse, scheduling, batch execution, concurrency, observability, and the other plumbing around running browser code. On the agent side, it took us a few iterations to get to the current approach. Our initial attempts were rigid pipelines: collect requirements, inspect the site, generate code, then try to patch whatever broke. It looked reasonable on paper, but real websites are too messy for fixed paths. Late last year, we were planning to ship that version when stronger models landed and harnesses like Claude Code and Codex showed what a more open-ended coding agent could do. We built a prototype on the Claude Agent SDK, it felt much better than what we had, and we scrapped the release and decided to rebuild the agent. The rebuild came down to three pieces around the SDK: an execution environment for running long agent sessions reliably, a CLI that exposes the platform to the agent so it operates Intuned the way engineers do, and a custom plugin (skills + MCP) built around what we've learned building browser automations. The infra-agent integration is where the product gets more interesting. The runtime doesn't just run the automation; it captures the context needed to debug it when it fails: params, results, traces, logs. That enables features like Fix with AI, where you can open a failed run and have the agent investigate and prepare a fix. The same integration powers a feature called self-healing. For configured projects, the platform detects failures, starts an agent session with the relevant context, and either proposes a fix for review or deploys it automatically. Demo: https://youtu.be/IVHIXw0lYMs We recently also packaged the infra and agent as an API called Web Task API, here is a demo: https://youtu.be/1olRn3l95vw We strongly believe that browser automations can and should be faster, cheaper and more predictable. Check us out at https://app.intuned.io/, we have a free tier with trial credits for your first few automations. Excited to hear your thoughts, questions, and feedback!

Integuru

Hey HN! We’re Alan and Richard from Integuru (YC W24). We generate fast, reliable integrations for platforms lacking official APIs. About 2 years ago, we released the first agent that reverse-engineers network traffic to build integrations (https://github.com/Integuru-AI/Integuru). Since then, we’ve developed a new approach to reverse-engineer platforms’ source code directly. This solution also includes authentication support. Here’s a demo: https://youtu.be/4l2L8fILC2g?si=nbWbDiFrWZIWRPM7. Many AI products need to integrate with web apps, but platforms often lack official APIs. So far, there are two main ways to integrate: browser automation and via network requests. We set out to build the original agent because we ourselves suffered from RPA’s latency, reliability, and throughput issues. The original agent solved many of the prior issues, but it wasn’t perfect either. The original agent did things the obvious way: (1) have a human do the action; (2) the agent observes the network requests and (3) recreates them. That got us far, but it only supported the path the user triggered. In production, we saw all the uncovered cases: different states, missing fields, permission differences, hidden validations, and request changes we could never catch in a single run. So we started building a new solution from the ground up. Our first step was to add agents that trigger many variations of the same action. To protect the platform’s data integrity, we added a gating layer that blocks outbound requests. This lets us observe the exact request structure, branching behavior, and platform logic without accidentally mutating the live system. But this still wasn’t enough. Some logic is hard to surface by execution alone. A lot of the business rules live in the frontend bundle. So we set out to analyze the true “answer sheet” for each platform: the source code. After experimenting, we got this working. We built a source-code analysis layer that deobfuscates and traces the code associated with each action. In practical terms, our system can handle most tricky edge cases without triggering all flows. Together, these two layers result in much better coverage of the production surface area. They support more edge cases, fail less often, and avoid a lot of the brittle one-off fixes that usually come later. Finally, we added auto-healing and API doc generation to improve reliability and the UX. We also offer a 24/7 on-call maintenance team for companies on the production plan. We now spend most of our time supporting vertical AI companies and helping them connect to their customer systems. We offer a free plan for integrating with one platform and charge for additional platforms, accounts, and overage API calls. For instance, we help healthcare AI companies connect to EHRs and payer portals, and logistics companies connect to TMSs and ERPs. Some companies are now running more than 1M monthly requests per platform. Across our production users, API calls complete in ~3 seconds at 99.9%+ success rate on average. We’re also building a library of APIs that users can use out of the box. That said, this version still has limitations we want to iterate on. Although we already tackle some anti-bot mechanisms, the agent still struggles to generate integrations with heavily anti-botted platforms. When the agent fails, our on-call team steps in to improve the agent or build the integration manually if the customer requests it. Also, the UX for generating an integration is still quite manual. Our next step is to build a CLI experience, so people and their agents can create, test, and use integrations in a much more flexible manner. This also prevents humans from having to wait for Integuru to finish its tasks. We want to one day allow developers and agents to integrate with all platforms instantly. Integuru is an ongoing effort. We’re passionate about automating integrations and would love your feedback!

LINQ CLI

Hey my name is Patrick, I’m a co-founder and CTO of Linq. We’re an API for sending and receiving iMessages (it does RCS/SMS too). It can do everything you can manually in iMessage (typing indicators, reactions, delivery emphasis, FindMy etc.) Our main customers are companies building conversational agents but we’re wanting to make it easier for developers to get started for free. To do that we built a CLI that lets you manage up to 20 contacts and gives you full API access for free. I’d love your feedback so we can keep improving it. Install via npm using: npm install -g @linqapp/cli Recently, I used the CLI to connect my Claude bot to WeWork & iMessage and haven’t had to use the WeWork app in a few weeks to book rooms. Github: https://github.com/linq-team/linq-cli Landing page: https://linqapp.com/cli Three constraints you should know about: 1. The free tier requires inbound-first (ie someone must text you before you text them) and has a limit of 20 contacts. This is to avoid spam. 2. The line is shared. This means a few other people will be using the same phone number as you, none of our paid production lines work this way. If you're testing enterprise grade our sandbox mirrors production, but has a 7 day time limit. The CLI is shared because there is a real infrastructure cost to us and we want to give this away for free. 3. We require an email to sign up. To avoid spam + our infrastructure cost. To be precise about "open source", it's the CLI. The whole client is in that repo, so you can read exactly what leaves your machine. The backend that delivers messages is closed.